by Michael Covel
"The global elites think you’re ignorant. That’s not my opinion. It comes straight from them. In this case, it’s from self-important James Traub, a Harvard graduate from the family that owns the Bloomingdale’s chain of luxury department stores. Here’s what Traub said: "It's time for the elites to rise up against the ignorant masses."
That says it all. His statement provides a key insight into the beliefs of the “ruling class.” You need to understand how they think and act if you want to avoid living as a slave. This guy is an establishment journalist and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. You see, as with most elites, the Brits’ Brexit vote has Traub threatened to his blue-blood core. And when people get emotional, their true feelings spill out. The ruling class’ gloves are coming off now, as evidenced by the meeting of Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch aboard her place. They simply do not care what you, I or anyone thinks.
Speaking of the ruling class, look at Hillary Clinton. The FBI recommended this week that she not be charged for mishandling classified information. I don’t care about your politics. But look, the director of the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation said, “There is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information.”
And Hillary still walked.
He also said: “It is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s email account.” Possible? Do you really think it’s “possible” with the full force of the FBI investigating that they couldn’t figure out exactly whether or not a foreign hostile actor gained access to her server? Comey knows. You know he knows. He knows he knows. But the game is rigged.
See, there are two separate versions of American jurisprudence. One version is reserved for Deep State members like her. The other is served cold to the peasant class. The system has been hijacked by the ruling class who lives by its own set of rules while the rest of us live by another. Sadly, none of this will change until there is an implosion."
Listen carefully to this exchange:
Listen carefully to this exchange:
July 7, 2016: Trey Gowdy grills Jim Comey on Hillary Clinton Email Scandal
Consider that information according to this definition:
"18 U.S. Code § 1621 - Perjury Generally
(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or
(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States."
"Perjury, also known as forswearing, is the intentional act of swearing a false oath or of falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to an official proceeding. Contrary to popular misconception, no crime has occurred when a false statement is (intentionally or unintentionally) made while under oath or subject to penalty—instead, criminal culpability only attaches at the instant the declarant falsely asserts the truth of statements (made or to be made) which are material to the outcome of the proceeding. Like most other crimes in the common law system, to be convicted of perjury one must have had the intention (mens rea) to commit the act, and to have actually committed the act (actus reus)."
"Intent and consciousness of guilt..."
Does any of that ring true about Clinton's statements?
Now watch as Comey lays out the "fact patterns" on criminality regarding Clinton's email server, clearly demonstrating intent and actual commission:
July 5, 2016: FBI Director James Comey On Hillary Clinton Email Investigation- House Oversight
After revealing "evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information”, his conclusion that charges should not be brought, in light of the clear and obvious evidence of wrongdoing, was very confusing. That made no sense to me, either, until I placed it in the true context of how the Elites can and will do anything and everything to further their interests and protect their privileged position and power. His ultimate reasoning and motives are actually very simple, quite understandable, and this is no joke...
As so many have...