Sunday, November 27, 2016

"Recount Disgrace: Jill Stein for Hillary?"

"Recount Disgrace: Jill Stein for Hillary?"
by Steve Lendman

"Shameful! What’s going on? Why did her campaign announce its “intent to file for a recount of votes in the battleground states of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, leading a multi-partisan effort to check the accuracy of the machine-counted vote tallies in these states in order to ensure the integrity of our election?”

Did she forget Hillary criticizing Trump’s possible refusal to accept electoral results when asked, calling it “a direct threat to our democracy?”

Does she support what war goddess, racketeer, perjurer Hillary stands for? Does she oppose Trump wanting normalized relations with Russia- crucial to prevent the threat of possible nuclear war with Hillary empowered as US military commander-in-chief.

I supported Stein, believed in her, wrote glowing articles about her campaign, her advocacy for world peace, equity and justice. Was I wrong? Did I misjudge her? Is she against what she claims to stand for? Many times in articles I called Hillary the most ruthlessly dangerous presidential aspirant in US history. Does Stein support her? Want the election reversed in her favor? Why else would she want recounts in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin? Outrageous!

Interviewed by Sputnik News, she said she raised over $3.7 million dollars so far, aiming for up to $7 million to cover all costs, and complete the task by filing deadlines- Nov. 25 in Wisconsin, Nov. 28 in Pennsylvania, and Nov. 30 in Michigan.

A pre-Thanksgiving Day article asked if Hillary intended to challenge the electoral results. In my judgment, Trump won because deep state power brokers jettisoned her as damaged goods, too scandal-ridden to serve effectively, choosing Trump instead.

Neither snow nor rain nor gloom of night nor Stein’s misguided effort will change the electoral results - just stir the pot disruptively for some days, accomplishing nothing but shaming herself.

Claiming “we deserve some confidence in the outcome of this election” misses the crucial point. Hillary as president risked possible cataclysmic nuclear war with Russia. Trump wants normalized ties, both countries cooperating in combating terrorism. That’s the core issue aside from all others- including the nonexistent integrity of America’s electoral system. Failure to understand it shows poor judgment on Stein’s part at the least- recklessness at worst. And why did Sputnik News publicize her effort? Surely it knows Putin prefers Trump over Hillary. So do I.

Will recounts be held in the three states in question? Doubtful, but we’ll see. Either way it won’t matter. On January 20, Trump’s inauguration will proceed as scheduled.”

"Simple clarification flowchart for snowflakes, swamp-rats, and sanctuary-dwellers."
by Tyler Durden
What was your "value", Jill, how much did it take?
 What was the price of your soul... Judas?

2 comments:

  1. what a scam...
    all three states would have to flipped to stop trump from becoming prez....that's not likely considering the margin of victory in each state.
    in Pennsylvania, the deadline for asking for a recount has passed, so the first stop will be a courthouse. then appeal after appeal, likely until it's too late.
    Michigan completed a 100% recount before it certified trump as the winner. any changed due another recount will stink of fraud.
    wisconsin had a win margin larger than the other two states, so looks like the hardest to flip.
    so why is this recount being asked for?? follow the money, as usual.
    the only people who stand to gain by this action are the hillery donor lawyers she will hire and reward with huge fees to pay them back for their losses due her failing to be elected. and use donated money to boot.
    it must be really frustrating to cheat this badly and still lose.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for stopping by and commenting, cannon, always appreciated! I couldn't agree with you more! Follow the money, as usual...

    ReplyDelete