“Flynn's Gone But They're Still Gunning For You, Donald”
By David Stockman
"I said the other day that Gen. Flynn's tenure in the White House was only slightly longer than that of President William Henry Harrison in 1841. Actually, with just 24 days in the White House, Gen. Flynn's tenure fell a tad short of old "Tippecanoe and Tyler Too." Gen. Harrison actually lasted 31 days before getting felled by pneumonia. And the circumstances were considerably more benign. It seems that Gen. Harrison had a fondness for the same "firewater" that agitated the Native Americans he slaughtered at the famous battle memorialized in his campaign slogan.
In fact, during the campaign, a leading Democrat newspaper skewered the old general, who at 68 was the oldest U.S. president prior to Ronald Reagan, saying: "Give him a barrel of hard [alcoholic] cider, and a pension of 2,000 [dollars] a year and he will sit the remainder of his days in his log cabin." That might have been a good idea back then (or even now), but to prove he wasn't sick, Harrison gave the longest inaugural address in U.S. history (two hours) in the midst of seriously inclement weather wearing no hat or coat.
That's how he got pneumonia! Call it foolhardy, but that was nothing compared with that exhibited by Donald Trump's former national security adviser. Gen. Flynn got the equivalent of political pneumonia by talking for hours during the transition to international leaders, including Russia's ambassador to the U.S., on phone lines that were bugged by the CIA. Or more accurately, making calls which were "intercepted" by the very same NSA/FBI spy machinery that monitors every single phone call made in America.
Ironically, we learned what Flynn should have known about the Deep State's omniscient surveillance from Edward Snowden. Alas, Flynn and Trump wanted Snowden to be hung in the public square as a "traitor," but if that's the solution to Intelligence Community leaks, The Donald is now going to need his own rope factory to deal with the flood of traitorous disclosures directed against him.
In any event, it was "intercepts" leaked from deep in the bowels of the CIA to The Washington Post and then amplified in a 24/7 campaign by the War Channel (CNN) that brought Gen. Flynn down. But here's the thing. They were aiming at Donald J. Trump. And for all of his puffed-up bluster about being the savviest negotiator on the planet, The Donald walked right into their trap.
But let's first make the essence of the matter absolutely clear. The whole Flynn fiasco is not about a violation of the 218-year-old Logan Act banning private citizens from engaging in diplomacy with foreign powers. No one has ever even been prosecuted under the Logan Act, for crying out loud.
The Flynn fiasco is about re-litigating the 2016 election based on the hideous lie that Trump stole it with the help of Vladimir Putin. It won’t end with Flynn. I say good riddance to Flynn because he was a shrill anti-Iranian warmonger. But let's also not be fooled about what’s happened here.
The Flynn affair proves that the Deep State taps the phone calls of the President's own closest advisors as a matter of course. This is the real scandal as Trump himself has rightly asserted. The very idea that the already announced top national security advisor to a President-elect should be subject to old-fashion "bugging," albeit with modern day technology, overwhelmingly trumps the specious Logan Act charge at the center of the case.
Perhaps you recall the name Sally Yates. She was the former Obama holdover who was Trump’s acting Attorney General before he canned her for undermining his executive orders. As one writer for LawNewz noted regarding Yates' voyeuristic preoccupation with Flynn's intercepted conversations, Nixon should be rolling in his grave with envy: "Now, information leaks that Sally Yates knew about surveillance being conducted against potential members of the Trump administration, and disclosed that information to others. Even Richard Nixon didn’t use the government agencies themselves to do his black bag surveillance operations. Sally Yates involvement with this surveillance on American political opponents, and possibly the leaking related thereto, smacks of a return to Hoover-style tactics. As writers at Bloomberg and The Week both noted, "It reeks of “police-state” style tactics. But knowing dear Sally as I do, it comes as no surprise."
Yes, Obama left Yates behind to continue the 2016 election by other means. And it's working. The Donald is being rapidly emasculated by the powers that be in the Imperial City due to what can only be described as an audacious and self-evident attack on Trump's Presidency by the Deep State. Indeed, it seems that the layers of intrigue have gotten so deep and convoluted that the nominal leadership of the permanent government machinery has lost track of who is spying on whom.
Thus, we have the following curious utterance by none other than the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes: “I expect for the FBI to tell me what is going on, and they better have a good answer,” he told The Washington Post. “The big problem I see here is that you have an American citizen who had his phone calls recorded.” Well, yes. That makes 324 million of us, Congressman.
But for crying out loud, surely the oh so self-important chairman of the House intelligence committee knows that everybody is bugged. But when it reaches the point that the spy state is essentially using its unconstitutional tools to engage in what amounts to "opposition research" with the aim of election nullification, then the Imperial City has become a clear and present danger to American democracy and the liberties of the American people.
As Robert Barnes of LawNewz further explained, Sally Yates, former CIA director John Brennan and a large slice of the Never Trumper intelligence community were systematically engaged in "opposition research" during the campaign and the transition: "According to published reports, someone was eavesdropping, and recording, the conversations of Michael Flynn, while Sally Yates was at the Department of Justice. Sally Yates knew about this eavesdropping, listened in herself (Pellicano-style for those who remember the infamous LA cases), and reported what she heard to others. For Yates to have such access means she herself must have been involved in authorizing its disclosure to political appointees, since she herself is such a political appointee. What justification was there for an Obama appointee to be spying on the conversations of a future Trump appointee?"
Consider this little tidbit in The Washington Post. The paper, which once broke Watergate, is now propagating the benefits of Watergate-style surveillance in ways that do make Watergate look like a third-rate effort. (With the) FBI “routinely” monitoring conversations of Americans, Yates listened to “the intercepted call,” even though Yates knew there was “little chance” of any credible case being made for prosecution under a law “that has never been used in a prosecution.”
And well it hasn't been. After all, the Logan Act was signed by President John Adams in 1799 in order to punish one of Thomas Jefferson's supporters for having peace discussions with the French government in Paris. That is, it amounted to pre-litigating the Presidential campaign of 1800 based on sheer political motivation.
According to the Washington Post itself, that is exactly what Yates and the Obama holdovers did day and night during the transition period: "Indeed, the paper details an apparent effort by Yates to misuse her office to launch a full-scale secret investigation of her political opponents, including “intercepting calls” of her political adversaries."
So all of the feigned outrage emanating from Democrats and the Washington establishment about Team Trump's trafficking with the Russians is a cover story. Surely anyone even vaguely familiar with recent history would have known there was absolutely nothing illegal or even untoward about Flynn's post-Christmas conversations with the Russian Ambassador.
Indeed, we recall from personal experience the thrilling moment on inauguration day in January 1981 when word came of the release of the American hostages in Tehran. Let me assure you, that did not happen by immaculate diplomatic conception- nor was it a parting gift to the Gipper by the outgoing Carter Administration. To the contrary, it was the fruit of secret negotiations with the Iranian government during the transition by private American citizens. As the history books would have it because it's true, the leader of that negotiation, in fact, was Ronald Reagan's national security council director-designate, Dick Allen.
As the real Washington Post later reported, under the by-line of a real reporter, Bob Woodward: "Reagan campaign aides met in a Washington DC hotel in early October, 1980, with a self-described "Iranian exile" who offered, on behalf of the Iranian government, to release the hostages to Reagan, not Carter, in order to ensure Carter's defeat in the November 4, 1980 election. The American participants were Richard Allen, subsequently Reagan's first national security adviser, Allen aide Laurence Silberman, and Robert McFarlane, another future national security adviser who in 1980 was on the staff of Senator John Tower (R-TX)."
To this day I have not had occasion to visit my old friend Dick Allen in the U.S. penitentiary because he's not there; the Logan Act was never invoked in what is surely the most blatant case ever of citizen diplomacy.
So let's get to the heart of the matter and be done with it. The Obama White House conducted a sour grapes campaign to delegitimize the election beginning November 9th and it was led by then CIA Director John Brennan. That treacherous assault on the core constitutional matter of the election process culminated in the ridiculous Russian meddling report of the Obama White House in December. The latter, of course, was issued by serial liar James Clapper, as national intelligence director, and the clueless Democrat lawyer and bag-man, Jeh Johnson, who had been appointed head of the Homeland Security Department.
Yet on the basis of the report's absolutely zero evidence and endless surmise, innuendo and "assessments", the Obama White House imposed another round of its silly school-boy sanctions on a handful of Putin's cronies. Of course, Flynn should have been telling the Russian Ambassador that this nonsense would be soon reversed!
But here is the ultimate folly. The mainstream media talking heads are harrumphing loudly about the fact that the very day following Flynn's call- Vladimir Putin announced that he would not retaliate against the new Obama sanctions as expected; and shortly thereafter, the Donald tweeted that Putin had shown admirable wisdom. That's right. Two reasonably adult statesman undertook what might be called the Christmas Truce of 2016. But like its namesake of 1914 on the bloody no man's land of the western front, the War Party has determined that the truce-makers shall not survive.
The Donald has been warned."
The Donald has been warned."