Tuesday, June 27, 2017

"US May Be Preparing for 'Preemptive Strike' on Syria Amid Chemical Weapons Claim"

"US May Be Preparing for 'Preemptive Strike' on
 Syria Amid Chemical Weapons Claim"
by Sputnik

"The United States might be preparing for a "preemptive" attack on Syrian government troops as the White House warned of a possible chemical attack allegedly planned by Damascus, senior Russian lawmaker Konstantin Kosachev said Tuesday. Earlier in the day, the White House claimed that Washington had identified "potential preparations" for a chemical attack by Syrian President Bashar Assad’s forces. The Kremlin commented on the claims and said that it considers US' threats against Syrian legitimate leadership to be "unacceptable." Damascus also denied the information.

Michael Rivero comments: "I think the Russian analysis, presented here at sputniknews.com, is completely reasonable. We are most likely looking at an horrific false flag operation, courtesy of the US military and various Us alphabet soup agencies in Syria, to be blamed on the Syrian government, as the justification for a full-scale invasion of Syria, in order to attempt regime change in Damascus. But the questions I would have to ask about such a scenario are:

1. Why would al-Assad do this when his troops are winning against ISIS on the ground?
2. Weren't Syria's chemical weapons completely destroyed under a Russian brokered, and UN-supervised program several years ago?

Of course, such an invasion most probably means war with Russia, but what does the American Deep State care about the good of 'We the People?' The short answer is, absolutely nothing. They have their elaborate bunkers, and top of the line survival gear in hand; the rest of us can just die of radiation sickness, and they won't give a damn.

This is officially insane, and the fact that the US government collectively thinks, for one millisecond, that the American people would believe this codswallop, demonstrates that they have learned utterly nothing from having lied this country into the the military misadventures which are still with us, Afghanistan and Iraq."
"This is officially insane," Rivero writes. To relentlessly risk nuclear war IS an insane act, to any rational human being. But what if they're not "rational human beings" at all, instead an intra-species predator genetically proven different from the 94% of the rest of us? What then? It would explain a great deal...

"When you've eliminated the impossible, whatever remains,
 however improbable, must be the truth."
- "Sherlock Holmes", by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

"Imagine - if you can - not having a conscience, none at all, no feelings of guilt or remorse no matter what you do, no limiting sense of concern for the well-being of strangers, friends, or even family members. Imagine no struggles with shame, not a single one in your whole life, no matter what kind of selfish, lazy, harmful, or immoral action you had taken. And pretend that the concept of responsibility is unknown to you, except as a burden others seem to accept without question, like gullible fools. Those who have no conscience at all are a group unto themselves, whether they be homicidal tyrants or merely ruthless social snipers.

Now add to this strange fantasy the ability to conceal from other people that your psychological makeup is radically different from theirs. Since everyone simply assumes that conscience is universal among human beings, hiding the fact that you are conscience-free is nearly effortless. You are not held back from any of your desires by guilt or shame, and you are never confronted by others for your cold-bloodedness. The ice water in your veins is so bizarre, so completely outside of their personal experience, that they seldom even guess at your condition. In other words, you are completely free of internal restraints, and your unhampered liberty to do just as you please, with no pangs of conscience, is conveniently invisible to the world."

No comments:

Post a Comment